Guidelines for the development of factors influencing the innovative organization of secondary schools under the office of the basic education commission in lower northeastern region 1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were 1) to study the level of educational innovative organization; 2) to examine factors influencing said organization; 3) to investigate relationships and factors predicting the organization; and 4) to establish development guidelines for secondary schools. The research was conducted in two phases: identifying influencing factors and developing the guidelines. The sample included 147 secondary schools in Chaiyaphum, Nakhon Ratchasima, Buriram, and Surin provinces, determined via the Krejcie & Morgan table from a population of 238 schools. Stratified random sampling based on school size was followed by simple random sampling through a drawing-lots method. A total of 246 administrators and teachers provided the data. Research instruments consisted of a 5-level rating scale questionnaire, validated by 5 experts (IOC 0.6–1.0) and an overall reliability coefficient of 0.861, as well as an appropriateness evaluation form assessed by seven qualified experts. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis.
The results revealed that: 1) A high overall level of educational innovative, with personnel competency and teamwork receiving the highest mean 2) A high overall level of influencing, with organizational structure conducive to innovation achieving the highest mean. 3) Five factors significantly predicted the innovative organization at a .01 level, explaining 90.50% of the variance (R2 = .905). Agile-based agility (X8), organizational climate (X7), leadership and organizational culture (X5), technology management, communication, and evaluation systems (X3), and innovation-supportive strategy (X1). The predictive equations were as follows. Raw Score Form Y ̂= 0.470 + 0.278(X8) + 0.205(X7) + 0.188(X5) + 0.144(X3) + 0.127(X1) Standardized Form ZY = 0.351(Zx8) + 0.256(Zx7) + 0.224(Zx5) + 0.174(Zx3) + 0.142(Zx1) 4). The developed guidelines for all five factors were rated at the highest level of appropriateness
Article Details
References
นิรัติศรัย ธรรมศร, สิทธิพร เขาอุ่น, และ สิริมาส หมื่นสาย. (2566). การบริหารจัดการสู่องค์กรนวัตกรรมของโรงเรียนในสังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษา สำนักงานศึกษาธิการภาค 18. วารสารสหวิทยาการมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์, 6(3), 1567–1573.
สุธรรม ธรรมทัศนานนท์. (2564). การบริหารสู่องค์การแห่งนวัตกรรมการศึกษา. มหาสารคาม: ตักสิลาการพิมพ์.
สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2565). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ (พ.ศ. 2561–2580). สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: How smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. AMACOM.
Doerr, J. (2018). Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs. Portfolio.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kenpahoom,S. (2024, August). Agile management: Mastering change in today’s dynamic environment. Proceedings of the 8th National and International Virtual Conference on Multidisciplinary Research Minia, Egypt: Minia University.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1-55.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovation: Controlled chaos. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73–84.
Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 40–50.
Sutherland, J. (2014). Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time. Crown Business.
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (7th ed.). Wiley.
Vrakking, W. J. (1990). The innovative organization. Long Range Planning, 23(2), 94–102.
