The Advancement of Professional Standards for Modern Educational Administrators
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The advancement of professional qualifications for modern school administrators is vital for analyzing their progress and highlighting their essential role in enhancing the quality of national education. This discussion is particularly pertinent given the technological advancements and social changes that profoundly affect learning and school management. The text explores the criteria and evaluation methods for school administrators' qualifications in today's context, emphasizing the necessity of refining the evaluation system to align with the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand and the 20-Year National Strategy to improve educational quality. School administrators seeking qualification assessment must fulfill specific criteria, which include tenure, compliance with position agreements, and adherence to discipline, ethics, and professional standards during the retrospective period. A committee of three experts conducts the evaluation process, assessing candidates' performance based on defined indicators and criteria. This framework seeks to enhance and modernize the qualification assessment system for school administrators, improving its efficiency and relevance. It gives administrators a thorough understanding of contemporary evaluation practices, reduces redundancy, and boosts operational effectiveness in line with ongoing educational and societal shifts. Ultimately, this ensures that school administration effectively supports sustainable improvements in educational quality.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
แนวคิดและข้อเสนอแนะที่นำเสนอในบทความของ LEAD Journal เป็นแนวคิดที่มาจากผู้เขียน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนเป็นผู้รับผิดชอบแต่เพียงผู้เดียว
ทั้งนี้ บรรณาธิการ กองบรรณาธิการ และคณะกรรมการหน่วยจัดทำวารสาร LEAD จะไม่ก้าวก่ายความมั่นคงในหลักการตามความคิดของผู้เขียน
ดังนั้น บรรณาธิการ กองบรรณาธิการ คณะกรรมการหน่วยจัดทำวารสาร และมหาวิทยาลัย จะไม่รับผิดชอบใด ๆ จากผลที่เกิดขึ้นจากการนำเสนอแนวคิด และข้อเสนอแนะของผู้แต่งที่เผยแพร่ในวารสาร LEAD
References
Chairipoo, K., Bumbudtuk, N., ... and Nilkote, R. (2022). Teacher Academic Assessment System and Student Outcomes in the Era of Change. Journal of Quality of Life and Law, 18(2), 101-110. [In Thai].
Chaisri, P. (2024). The Role of Educational Administrators in the New Era. (Master of Thesis, Phetchabun Rajabhat University). [In Thai].
Chimpaleesawan, A. (2021). The Condition of Requesting to Have or to Promote Academic Standing Towards the Performance of Teacher Civil Servants in Secondary Education Service Area Office District 42. Journal of Basic Education Research, Inaugural Issue, July–December 2021, 183-194. [In Thai].
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B. and Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill.
Department of Curriculum and Instruction. (2020). Standards for the Evaluation and Development of Educational Administrators. Bangkok: Department of Curriculum and Instruction. [In Thai].
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., … and Jansorn, N. R. (2011). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. (2011). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ninkaew, J. (2022). The Role of Administrators in Promoting the Use of Innovation and Information Technology for Learning Management of Teachers under Chumphon Primary Education Service Area Office 1. (Master of Thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology). [In Thai].
Prachongsak, S. (2011). A Study on Processes and Steps in Producing Academic Papers to be Ranked as a Specialist Teacher. Journal of Education and Social Development, 7(1), 57-67. [In Thai].
Suntan, K (2020). Managerial Strategies for Education Quality of Small-Scaled Primary Schools According to the Student Focus Concept. (Master of Thesis, Eastern Asia University). [In Thai].
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for Sustainable Development: An Expert Review of Processes and Learning. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Rethinking Education: Towards a Global Common Good?. Prance: UNESCO.
Watkins, K. E. and Marsick, V. J. (2017). Facilitating Learning Organizations: Making Learning Count. England: Gower.