Development of cooperative learning using circ techniques combind with stylistic images in song lirics. To promote reading ability and achievement in thai language for students in grade 5 under the office of the private educaiont commission

Abstract

           The objective of this research were to aims to develop learning management using the collaborative learning technique CIRC for students under the Office of the Private Education Commission to be effective according to the specified criteria of not less than 80 percent, compare the learning achievement in Thai language using figurative language in song lyrics to promote reading ability of primary school students before and after learning, and study the satisfaction of primary school students grade 5 towards learning management activities using the collaborative teaching technique CIRC. The research results found that the set of CIRC collaborative learning activities with figurative language in song lyrics to promote reading ability and Thai language learning achievement is the reading content about the nature of family relationships, totaling 5 sets. The sum of the evaluation average is the most appropriate.

           After measuring the Thai language learning achievement, the experimental group had a higher score than before the experiment, in accordance with the hypothesis, which was less than the statistical significance level of .05. The experimental group students and teachers had consistent opinions that after organizing the activity, the students developed their reading skills and increased their learning achievement, resulting in students who were eager to learn and understood the steps of the activity. The satisfaction of the fifth grade students with the learning management activities using the CIRC collaborative teaching method was found to be at the highest level overall, with an average of 4.53 and a standard deviation of 0.50. The areas with the highest averages were teaching materials and teachers, with an average of 4.60, followed by the learning atmosphere, with an average of 4.49, followed by measurement and evaluation, with an average of 4.48, and the area with the lowest average was learning management, with an average of 4.46.