The Eight Knowledges (Vijjā 8) in the Theravāda Pāli Canon
Keywords:
Vijjā 8, Theravāda Buddhism, Ascetic Practice, Noble Eightfold Path, Cessation of SufferingAbstract
This article aims to examine, analyze, and synthesize the concept of the Eight Knowledges (Vijjā 8) in Theravāda Buddhism, with particular emphasis on clarifying their meanings, structural framework, and roles in relation to ascetic practice (samaṇa-dhamma), the Noble Eightfold Path, and the cessation of suffering. The study adopts a documentary research methodology, drawing primarily on the Pāli Canon as preserved in the Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University edition, together with the commentarial tradition, especially the Visuddhimagga, as well as major works of Buddhist philosophical interpretation such as Buddhadhamma.
The findings indicate that the Eight Knowledges do not constitute a homogeneous doctrinal category with equal status. Rather, they display a clear hierarchy of value and function. Most of the knowledges are classified as mundane (lokiya), arising from tranquillity meditation and advanced states of concentration, and serve to demonstrate the potential and dexterity of the cultivated mind; however, they do not directly eradicate ignorance (avijjā) or the defilements (āsava). In contrast, insight knowledge (vipassanā-ñāṇa) and, most notably, the knowledge of the destruction of the defilements (āsavakkhaya-ñāṇa) play a direct and decisive role in the process of liberation, with the latter constituting the highest form of knowledge and the definitive criterion for the attainment of arahantship.
The classification of the Eight Knowledges in the commentarial literature is therefore not intended to promote the pursuit of supernormal powers or extraordinary cognitive abilities. Rather, it serves to elucidate the outcomes of fully developed ascetic practice within the framework of the Noble Eightfold Path. Understanding the Eight Knowledges in this manner helps to correct common misconceptions that overemphasize miraculous or supernormal aspects, and it reaffirms the distinctive identity of Theravāda Buddhism as a doctrinal system fundamentally oriented toward the eradication of the defilements and the realization of genuine liberation.
References
มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.
พระราชธรรมนิเทศ (ระแบบ ฐิตญาโณ). (2554). อภิญญา วิชชา และอาสวักขยญาณในพระพุทธศาสนา. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.
พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2560). พุทธธรรม (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 36). กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิการศึกษาพุทธธรรม.
พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2557). พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสตร์ ฉบับประมวลธรรม. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิการศึกษาพุทธธรรม.
พระพุทธโฆสาจารย์. (2554). วิสุทธิมรรค (แปลไทย). กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.
สมภาร พรมทา. (2556). พุทธจริยศาสตร์เชิงเหตุผล. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สมภาร พรมทา. (2561). ความรู้กับความหลุดพ้นในพุทธปรัชญาเถรวาท. วารสารพุทธปรัชญา, 5(2), 1–25.
Buddhaghosa. (2010). The Path of Purification (Visuddhimagga) (B. Ñāṇamoli, Trans.). Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
Cousins, L. S. (1996). The origins of insight meditation. Buddhist Studies Review, 13(1), 35–58.
Gombrich, R. (2009). What the Buddha thought. London: Equinox.
Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kalupahana, D. J. (1992). A history of Buddhist philosophy: Continuities and discontinuities. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Ñāṇamoli, B., & Bodhi, B. (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Rahula, W. (1974). What the Buddha taught (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Grove Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pāli–Theravāda Review Journal (PTRJ)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.


