Comparative Study of Management Requirements for Maintaining Continuing Airworthiness

Abstract

This research aimed to study and compare the requirements for managing the continuing airworthiness set by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (CAAT). It also sought to propose guidelines for improving Thailand's requirements to align with EASA standards while ensuring their suitability for the Thai context. The study employed a qualitative research approach using document analysis. A gap analysis was conducted to assess differences between the airworthiness management requirements of EASA and CAAT. The findings revealed that CAAT's requirements largely align with EASA's, reflecting consistency, comprehensiveness, and completeness in critical components. However, certain differences were identified, including variations in document structure, additional requirements under the Air Navigation Act, certification procedures for repair stations, evaluation of premises' orderliness and cleanliness, storage periods for technical documents, maintenance history details, aircraft maintenance plans, maintenance training courses, and general maintenance manual requirements. To enhance compliance and effectiveness, it is recommended that CAAT regularly review and update its requirements to ensure they remain comprehensive, current, and consistent with the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) standards. Additionally, air operators should revise their related manuals to maintain accuracy and alignment with the latest regulations.