Advancements and Challenges in Asset Pricing: Revisit on CEOs’ Characteristic and Firm Digitalization
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Over the last decade, asset pricing research has significantly expanded beyond traditional risk-based paradigms to incorporate insights from behavioral finance, machine learning applications, and firm-specific factors. This paper examines how CEO characteristics—specifically age, international experience, hometown identity, duality, and gender—together with firm digitalization (including digital transformation levels, IT investments, and AI adoption), shape corporate risk profiles and valuation. Recent advances in extended factor models, such as Fama–French extensions and mispricing factors, have enhanced our ability to explain return anomalies, while machine learning techniques help address the “factor zoo” problem by identifying previously overlooked predictors. Empirical evidence suggests that CEO demographics and backgrounds can influence strategic decision-making, thereby affecting asset pricing outcomes. Meanwhile, digital transformation has emerged as a crucial driver of intangible assets and operational efficiency; however, standard valuation approaches often struggle to fully capture these intangible benefits. Challenges remain in measuring and integrating CEO and digitalization variables into asset pricing models, due to issues related to data availability, endogeneity, and the transient nature of technological advantages. Future research should refine measurement strategies, develop dynamic modeling frameworks, and explore interactions among leadership attributes, digital capabilities, and traditional risk factors to better capture the complexity of modern asset pricing
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A. X., & Hodson, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745.
Chen, J., Hu, P., Liu, S., & Liu, X. (2024). Too scared to make mistakes at home: CEO hometown identity and corporate risk-taking. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102387.
Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22.
Giglio, S., Kelly, B. T., & Xiu, D. (2022). Factor models, machine learning, and asset pricing. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 337–368.
Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Econometrica, 88(6), 2329–2368.
Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650–705.
Le, S., & Kroll, M. (2017). CEO international experience: Effects on strategic change and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(5), 573–595.
Mubeen, R., Han, D., Abbas, J., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Sial, M. S. (2021). The relationship between CEO duality and business firms’ performance: The moderating role of firm size and corporate social responsibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 669715.
Nanayakkara, N. S., Nimal, P. D., & Weerakoon, Y. K. (2019). Behavioral asset pricing: A review. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(4), 101–108.
Ocean Tomo, LLC. (2020). Intangible asset market value study (2020 ed.).
Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579–586.
Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273.
Stambaugh, R. F., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Mispricing factors. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(4), 1270–1315.
Wang, D., & Xia, X. (2024). The impact of corporate digital transformation on firms’ performance in utilities sector. Heliyon, 10(1), e23362.