Resilient innovation ecosystems and sustainable business growth: Exploring the mediating role of organizational agility and the moderating role of digital platform integration

ผู้แต่ง

  • Xinru Yuan Innovation College, North-Chiang Mai University

คำสำคัญ:

resilient innovation ecosystems, organizational agility, digital platform integration, sustainable business growth

บทคัดย่อ

This study aimed to: 1. to assess the direct impact of firm participation in resilient innovation ecosystems on Sustainable Business Growth (SBG); 2. examine the mediating role of Organizational Agility (OA) in translating the benefits of ecosystem participation into long-term growth performance; 3. evaluate the moderating role of Digital Platform Integration (DPI) in strengthening the relationship between RIE and OA; 4. develop and empirically test a moderated mediation model linking RIE, OA, DPI, and SBG in innovation-intensive industries; and 5. provide theoretical and managerial insights for designing ecosystem participation strategies, enhancing agility capabilities, and leveraging digital platforms for competitive advantage and sustainability. The sample consisted of 390 innovation-intensive firms in Northern Thailand. This study employs Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Hayes' PROCESS analysis were employed to test a moderated mediation model. The results showed that: 1. RIEs had a significant positive impact on SBG; 2. OA partially mediated the relationship between RIEs and SBG, supporting the Dynamic Capabilities perspective that agility underpins sensing, seizing, and reconfiguration; 3. DPI played a significant moderating role between RIEs and OA and strengthened the indirect effect of RIEs on SBG through OA; 4. the overall model was empirically supported, demonstrating the interactive mechanisms among ecosystem resilience, agility, and digital integration. 5. The study advances the literature by integrating resilience theory, dynamic capabilities theory, and platform theory into a unified explanatory framework. In practice, this study provides actionable insights for SMEs seeking to achieve long-term sustainability under turbulence and policy recommendations for governments to invest in national digital infrastructure and open innovation platforms.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204–288). Oxford University Press.

Brusset, X., & Teller, C. (2017). Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 59–68.

Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2017). Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. Journal of Production Economics, 192, 54–65.

Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2019). Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30(3), 617–641.

Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976–997.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2020). To recover faster from COVID-19, open up: Managerial implications of open innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 410–413.

Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.

Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business.

Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382.

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.

Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.

Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do innovation ecosystems adapt? Global Food Security, 24, 100347.

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.

Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131.

Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

Srai, J. S., & Lorentz, H. (2019). Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing and supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(1), 78–98.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359–368.

Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M. A., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2026-01-01

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Yuan, X. (2026). Resilient innovation ecosystems and sustainable business growth: Exploring the mediating role of organizational agility and the moderating role of digital platform integration. วารสารการบริหาร การจัดการ และการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน, 3(4), 1756–1767. สืบค้น จาก https://so15.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jamsd/article/view/2325

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

Research Articles