RELIGIOUS ADHERENCE AND GOOD CITIZENSHIP: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THEIR DYNAMIC INTERPLAY IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/tacr.2025.3Keywords:
Religiosity, Civic Behavior, Systematic Review, Social Capital, MulticulturalismAbstract
This systematic review investigates the complex relationship between being a "good religious adherent" and a "good citizen" in contemporary society. Drawing on 21st-century empirical literature from diverse academic databases (Scopus, WoS, PubMed, JSTOR, TCI, and Google Scholar) across multiple disciplines—including philosophy, religious studies, political science, sociology, anthropology, and psychology—this study synthesizes definitions, measurements, and the dynamic interplay of these constructs. Findings reveal both roles are multidimensional and context-dependent. While religiosity frequently correlates positively with prosocial and civic behaviors, this relationship is neither universal nor straightforward, and moral frameworks and social networks mediate it. The study highlights that non-religious individuals can exhibit high civic engagement, and certain forms of intense religiosity may lead to intolerance. Key moderating factors include religiosity type, socio-political context, and religious diversity. We emphasize fostering inclusive religious interpretations and integrating religious values with democratic principles to harness religion's potential for societal good while mitigating its divisive tendencies. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and cross-cultural investigations into underlying mechanisms and the impact of contemporary social changes.
References
Adler, R., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by "civic engagement"? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236-253.
Banshong, A. (2021). Goodness, a Good Man, Life and Happiness: The Fundamental Ideas for Goodness Based Learning (GBL). Pathumthani University Academic Journal, 13(1), 460-480.
Basedau, M., Pfeiffer, B., & Vüllers, J. (2016). Bad religion? Religion, collective action, and the onset of armed conflict in developing countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60(2), 226-255.
Burris, C., & Navara, G. (2002). Morality Play or Playing Morality?: Intrinsic Religious Orientation and Socially Desirable Responding. Self and Identity, 1(1), 67-76.
Cesari, J. (2025). Laïcité and Religious Diversity in France: Embracing Institutional and Covenantal Pluralism for a More Inclusive Public Space. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 23(Sup1), 61-75.
Cohen, A., Malka, A., Rozin, P., & Cherfas, L. (2017). Religion and unforgivable offenses. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 85-118.
Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76-98.
Ginges, J., Hansen, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20(2), 224-230.
Goodman, S. (2025). Who is a Good Citizen? Evidence From a Conjoint Experiment in Three Democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 78(2), 585-600.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140-150.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
Grim, B., & Finke, R. (2010). The price of freedom denied: Religious persecution and conflict in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heater, D. (2013). What is citizenship? New York: Polity Press.
Hoskins, B., Saisana, M., & Villalba, C. (2015). Civic Competence of Youth in Europe: Measuring Cross National Variation Through the Creation of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 123, 431-457.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724.
Joseph, S. (2000). Religiosity and social desirability: A response to Eysenck (1999). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 3(1), 37-38.
Kelly, J., Kramer, S., & Shariff, A. (2024). Religiosity predicts prosociality, especially when measured by self-report: A meta-analysis of almost 60 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 150(3), 284-318.
Koenig, H., Al Zaben, F., & Khalifa, D. (2012). Religion, spirituality and mental health in the West and the Middle East. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 5(2), 180-182.
Leksuntarakorn, P., Piyakapho, P., Pethcharawises, C., & Thienorn, P. (2023). The Development of Guidelines for Enhancing Thai Youths for Being Good Citizenship of The Nation. National Defence Studies Institute Journal, 14(2), 108-122.
Lim, C., & MacGregor, C. (2012). Religion and volunteering in context: Disentangling the contextual effects of religion on voluntary behavior. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 747-779.
McCullough, M., & Willoughby, B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69-93.
Modood, T. (2019). Essays on secularism and multiculturalism. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Pargament, K., Mahoney, A., Exline, J., Jones, J., & Shafranske, E. (2013). Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In K. Pargament, J. Exline, & J. Jones (eds.). APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pharcharuen, W. (2019). Good Citizenship in the 21st Century Democratic Society. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Universities, 12(1), 283-292.
Putnam, R., & Campbell, D. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Roeser, R., & Peck, S. (2009). An education in awareness: Self, motivation, and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 119-136.
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191-210.
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320-1340.
Schattle, H. (2008). Education for global citizenship: Illustrations of ideological pluralism and adaptation. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 73-94.
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Hello, E. (2002). Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe: Cross-national tests on a controversial relationship. Review of Religious Research, 43(3), 242-265.
Tan, C. (2008). Creating ‘good citizens’ and maintaining religious harmony in Singapore. British Journal of Religious Education, 30(2), 133-142.
Unser, A. (ed.). (2021). Religion, Citizenship and Democracy. Cham: Springer.
Vignoles, V., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P., Easterbrook, M., Brown, R., ... & Bond, M. (2016). Beyond the 'east-west' dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966-1000.
Villalobos, C., Morel, M., & Treviño, E. (2021). What Is a “Good Citizen”? A Systematic Literature Review. In: E. Treviño, D. Carrasco, E. Claes & K. Kennedy (eds.). Good Citizenship for the Next Generation (pp. 13-32). Cham: Springer.
Voas, D., & Doebler, S. (2011). Secularization in Europe: Religious change between and within birth cohorts. Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe, 4(1), 39-62.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.
Zuckerman, P. (2009). Atheism, secularity, and well-being: How the findings of social science counter negative stereotypes and assumptions. Sociology Compass, 3(6), 949-971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความนี้ได้รับการเผยแพร่ภายใต้สัญญาอนุญาต Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ซึ่งอนุญาตให้ผู้อื่นสามารถแชร์บทความได้โดยให้เครดิตผู้เขียนและห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้าหรือดัดแปลง หากต้องการใช้งานซ้ำในลักษณะอื่น ๆ หรือการเผยแพร่ซ้ำ จำเป็นต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากวารสาร
.png)
