Development and Validation of a Creative Thinking Scale for Vocational Education Students
Keywords:
creative thinking, measurement instrument, vocational students, confirmatory factor analysisAbstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a creative thinking scale for vocational education students. The instrument consisted of 20 items rated on a five-point Likert scale and covered four components: originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. The sample included 700 vocational students selected through multi-stage sampling. The instrument was examined for content validity, reliability, and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results indicated that the instrument demonstrated strong psychometric properties. The content validity index ranged from 0.80 to 1.00, and the overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.97, indicating a high level of internal consistency. In addition, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the measurement model was well fitted to the empirical data. The model fit indices were χ²/df = 2.68, CFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.95, AGFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.049, and SRMR = 0.02, all of which met the recommended criteria for model fit. These findings suggest that the developed instrument possesses satisfactory validity and reliability and can be effectively used to assess the creative thinking of vocational education students.
References
ชนิสรา เมธภัทรหิรัญ. (2563). การแก้ปัญหาเชิงสร้างสรรค์. นิตยสาร สสวท, 48(222), 22-27.
นงลักษณ์ วิรัชชัย. (2542). โมเดลลิสเรล สถิติวิเคราะห์สำหรับการวิจัย. โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
วิชัย วงษ์ใหญ่. (2523). พัฒนาหลักสูตรและการสอนมิติใหม่. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2.กรุงเทพฯ: รุ่งเรื่องธรรม.
ศูนย์เทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและกำลังคนอาชีวศึกษา. (2566, 21 มิถุนายน). ข้อมูลนักเรียน นักศึกษา ปีการศึกษา 2566. https://techno.vec.go.th/
เสรี ชัดแซม และสุชาดา กรเพชรปาณ. (2546). โมเดลสมการโครงสร้าง. วารสารวิจัยและวัดผลการศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา, 1(1), 1-24.
Acar, S., Tadik, H., Myers, D., van der Sman, C., & Uysal, R. (2020). Creativity and Well‐being: A Meta‐analysis. The Journal of Creative
Behavior, 55(3), 738-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.485
Atesgoz, N. N., & Sak, U. (2021). Test of scientific creativity animations for children: Development and validity study. Thinking Skills and
Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100818
Ayasrah, S., Obeidat, M., Katatbeh, Q., Aljarrah, A., & Al-Akhras, M.-A. (2023). Practicing Creative Thinking and Its Relation to Academic
Achievement. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14661
Basadur, M. (1995). The Simplex Creative Problem Solving Process. Creativity and Innovation Management.
Clary, R. M., Brzuszek, R. F., & Fulford, C. T. (2011). Measuring Creativity: A Case Study Probing Rubric Effectiveness for Evaluation of
Project-Based Learning Solutions. Creative Education, 02(04), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.24047
Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics,
Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 329.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: Macgraw Hill.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A Global Perspective. .
Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (test for creative thinking-drawing production): an instrument that can be applied to
most age and ability groups. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Oh, J.-Y. (2021). Understanding the Scientific Creativity Based on Various Perspectives of Science. Axiomathes, 32(6), 907-929.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09553-8
Rawlison, J. G. (2005). Creative and Brain Storming Thinking. Jaico Publiching House.
Rodriguez, R. M., Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Puryear, J. S. (2023). Taking Inventory of the Creative Behavior Inventory: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the CBI. Creativity Research Journal, 35(2), 143-153.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2183322
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity
Research Journal, 13(3-4), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Gifted children in the classroom.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and psychological measurement.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Modern Management SHINAWATRA UNIVERSITY

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.