Ethics

Publishing Ethics and plagiarism policy

Process for publishing research results in this journal It is a systematic work process involving authors, evaluators, editors, and coordination and management departments. Therefore, in order to maintain ethical standards in publishing. and working politely in the academic circle Coordination and management work closely with editors, authors and raters. Business and Industrial Development Journal The ethical responsibilities of those involved in each sector have been determined as follows.

Editors Responsibilities:

1. Editor and/or editorial team It is responsible for considering and checking every article submitted for consideration for publication with the journal. By considering article content that is consistent with the journal's objectives. Including checking the quality of articles in the evaluation process and quality of articles before publication. and maintains the right to make final decisions on all articles that are evaluated for publication in the journal.
2. Editors should maintain the transparency of research with ethical standards. and will be happy to consider revoking publication or correct mistakes If notified and requested by the author
3. The editor should make the decision to consider the manuscript. To get quality content without making any biased decisions
4. Editors should evaluate original articles on the basis of their academic merit. and without commercial or personal gain
5. Editors should not publish any information. Related to articles submitted for consideration before publication
6. Editors should investigate promptly and thoroughly. If there is any suspicion of misconduct in research according to appropriate authority and duties.

Reviewers Responsibilities:

1. Evaluators should evaluate articles in their field of expertise. The quality of the article must be taken into account. Consider the article carefully and constructively. Under academic principles and reasons without bias or personal opinions and has no conflict of interest with the author. and report the evaluation results within the time period specified by the editor.
2. Evaluators evaluate the received manuscripts for originality. academic value Completeness of content and structure, language used, clarity of assumptions/objectives. Clarity of presentation and organization of articles Academic accuracy, discussion of results, and accurate citations according to academic principles as well as provide comments and suggestions that are beneficial to the quality of the article
3. The appraiser should not reveal any information. related to articles submitted for consideration before publication
4. The evaluator must not have conflicts of interest with the author or any other reasons. that makes it impossible to express opinions freely The article evaluator must notify the journal editor and reject the evaluation of the article.
5. The evaluator must inform the editor. When evidence of any wrongdoing is found of research ethics in the articles evaluated

Authors Responsibilities:

1. Every part of the article that appears in the original article must be a new work derived from facts from the study. Do not distort information There is no false information. and free from plagiarism
2. The article should not have been published anywhere before. or was sent for consideration in other journals during the same period.
3. Authors must clearly disclose conflicts of interest.
4. Authors must clearly write acknowledgments. Including specifying the source of research funding that is supported.
5. Confidential information of the organization must be approved by the relevant organization first.
6. All authors whose names appear in the article Must be a person who actually conducts research or is involved in conducting research.
7. Do not submit articles that have been written for others to be considered for publication.