Failure Mode Prioritization using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study in an Automotive Printing Factory
Keywords:
Prioritization, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Automotive IndustryAbstract
This research aimed to propose a prioritization approach for identifying and addressing printing defects in the automotive component manufacturing industry. The proposed approach utilized the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) within the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) framework, adhering to the IATF 16949 global automotive component manufacturing standard. The decision-making criteria were based on the AIAG & VDA FMEA Handbook, encompassing severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) for the main criteria and 4M (man, machine, method, material) and 1E (environment) for the sub-criteria. The occurring defects were collected from the case study factory, and defects were selected for prioritization using the S, O, D criteria. A group of 20 experts from various departments within the company evaluated the prioritization. The results were compared with those obtained using the traditional Risk Priority Number (RPN) and Action Priority (AP) methods. The findings revealed that all three prioritization methods yielded different results, with FAHP providing the most accurate and acceptable outcome due to its consideration of criteria weights and uncertainties in defect evaluation. The research emphasized the application of FAHP as a group decision-making tool, facilitating collaboration between cross-functional teams within the organization. Additionally, an Excel template was developed to streamline the calculation and analysis process, enabling efficient and accurate prioritization of printing defects.
References
Ploypanichcharoen, K. (2008). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (2nd ed.). Technology Promotion Association (Thai–Japan). (in Thai)
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). (2011). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)(4th ed.). United States: AIAG.
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) & Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA). (2019). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Handbook. United States: AIAG.
Emrouznejad, A., & Ho, W. (2018). FAHP Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (1st ed.). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Ivančić, V. (2014). Improving the Decision-Making Process Through the Pareto Principle Application. Ekonomska Misao i Praksa, (2), 633–656.
Opasanon, S. (2013). Multi Criteria Decision Making. Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 35(139), 1–4. (in Thai)
Khuanchai, I. (2015). Prioritization of Failure Modes by Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP): A Case Study of Electronics Part/Components Manufacturing Process [Master of Engineering]. Thammasat University. (in Thai)
Rangsikornphum, K. (2022). Decision Analysis for Engineering (1st ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press (CUPRINT). (in Thai)
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Support Materiality Assessment in Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.
Onar, S. Ç., Büyüközkan, G., Öztayşi, B., & Kahraman, C. (2016). A New Hesitant Fuzzy QFD Approach: An Application to Computer Workstation Selection. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.023
Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.
Metinee, J. (2016). Green Supply Chain Management Triple Bottom Line and Organization Theory Prioritization with Fuzzy AHP Method [Master of Engineering]. Thammasat University. (in Thai)
Thanitchet, D. (2023). Model Development Using the Fuzzy AHP Technique for Construction Safety Assessment, Phuket. The 28th National Convention on Civil Engineering, 28, 1–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Business and Industrial Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.