The need for collaborative internal supervision of the school to expand educational opportunities under the office of nongkhai primary education service office 2
Keywords:
Necessary needs, collaborative internal supervision, schools expanding educational opportunitiesAbstract
      This research aimed to study the current situation, desirable situation, and needs assessment of collaborative internal supervision implementation in educational opportunity expansion schools under the Nong Khai Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. This was quantitative research with a sample group of 186 school administrators and teachers from educational opportunity expansion schools. The sample size was determined using Krejcie and Morgan's sample size table, with administrators selected through purposive sampling and teachers selected through simple random sampling. The research instrument was a paired-response questionnaire using a 5-level rating scale, with a content validity index of 1.00 and overall reliability for the current situation of 0.902 and desirable situation of 0.973. Statistical methods used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and PNImodified index.
     Research findings revealed that:
     1. Current situation of collaborative internal supervision implementation in educational opportunity expansion schools was at a moderate level with a mean of (ðĨĖ = 3.46). The aspect with the highest mean was direct assistance to teachers, followed by curriculum development, and the lowest mean was group work skill development.
     2. Desirable situation of collaborative internal supervision implementation in educational opportunity expansion schools was at the highest level with a mean of (ðĨĖ = 4.51). The aspect with the highest mean was classroom action research, followed by curriculum development, and the lowest mean was professional experience enhancement.
      3. Needs assessment of collaborative internal supervision implementation in educational opportunity expansion schools, ranked by priority as follows: group work skill development had the highest needs index (PNIModified = 0.35), followed by classroom action research (PNIModified = 0.31), and the aspect with the lowest need was direct assistance to teachers (PNIModified = 0.26).
References
āļāļļāļāļāļĄ āļĻāļĢāļĩāļŠāļ°āļāļēāļ. (2560). āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļāļąāļĒāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāđāļ (āļāļīāļĄāļāđāļāļĢāļąāđāļāļāļĩāđ10 āļāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļĢāļļāļāđāļŦāļĄāđ). āļāļĢāļļāļāđāļāļāļŊ: āļŠāļļāļ§āļĩāļĢāļīāļĒāļēāļŠāļēāļŠāđāļ.
āļ āļēāļāļļāļ§āļąāļāļāđ āļāļēāļŠāļīāļāļāđ. (2553). āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļāļąāļĒāđāļāļāļąāđāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļđāđāļāļāļĨāļļāđāļĄāđāļĢāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāđāļŦāļĨāļĄāļāļąāļ§ āļŠāļąāļāļāļąāļāļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļāļĢāļāļāļĄāđāļāļ 2 āļāļąāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļĄ. āļāļĢāļļāļĻāļēāļŠāļāļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļąāļāļāļīāļ, āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļāļ āļąāļāļāđāļēāļāļŠāļĄāđāļāđāļāđāļāđāļēāļāļĢāļ°āļĒāļē.
āļĻāļīāļĢāļīāļ§āļĢāļĢāļ āđāļŠāļĢāļĩāļĢāļąāļāļāđ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļ°. (2545). āļāļāļāđāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢ. āļāļĢāļļāļāđāļāļāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļāļĢ : āđāļāļĄāļāļ āļāļīāļāļāļīāļŠāļŠāļīāđāļāđāļ āđāļ§āļīāļĢāđāļĨ.
āđāļŠāļāļĩāļĒāļĢ āđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ. (2542). āļāļēāļĢāļāļīāđāļāļĻāļ āļēāļĒāđāļāđāļĢāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĄāļąāļāļĒāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļŠāļąāļāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļāļļāļāļĢāļāļēāļāļĩ. āļĢāļēāļĒāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļāļ§āđāļēāļāļīāļŠāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļąāļāļāļīāļ, āļŠāļēāļāļēāļ§āļīāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē, āļāļąāļāļāļīāļāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ, āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĄāļŦāļēāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĄ.
āļŠāļļāļ§āļīāļĄāļĨ āļ§āđāļāļāļ§āļēāļāļīāļ. (2548). āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļāļąāļĒāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĄāļīāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāđāļāđāļ. āļāļĢāļļāļāđāļāļāļŊ: āļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļīāļĄāļāđ. āđāļŦāđāļāļāļļāļŽāļēāļĨāļāļāļĢāļāđāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ.
āļŠāļĄāđāļāļ āļāļīāļāļīāļāļŠāļāļļāļĨ. (2554). āļāļēāļĢāļāļīāđāļāļĻāļ āļēāļĒāđāļāđāļĢāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāđāļēāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāđāļēāđāļ āļāļāļāļļāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļāļīāļĄāļēāļāļāļąāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļĢāđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļ. āļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļāļīāļāļāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļąāļāļāļīāļ āļŠāļēāļāļēāļ§āļīāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļāļąāļāļāļīāļāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĄāļŦāļēāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĄ.
āļŠāļļāļ āļēāļāļĢ āļāļąāļĻāļĢāļēāļ§āļąāļāļāļē. (2541). āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĪāļāļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāļāļēāļāđāļāđāļāļāļĩāļĄāļāļāļāļāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāđāļāļāļāļ: āļāļĢāļāļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļŦāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāđāļāļĒ.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Glickman. (2004). Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental. Approach. (6 th ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lyman, F. (1987). Think-Pair-Share: An Ending Teaching Technique. United States of America: MAA-CIE Cooperative News.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.