Decoding trust: How transparency, political stability, and leadership shape public confidence in government institutions
คำสำคัญ:
accountability, governance, leadership, transparencyบทคัดย่อ
This study explores how transparency, political stability, and leadership influence public trust in government institutions through a qualitative approach involving in-depth interviews with 17 diverse key informants. Utilizing thematic analysis and NVivo tools, the research identifies critical themes that highlight the nuanced dynamics of trust-building in governance. Findings reveal that transparency enhances trust by promoting accountability and reducing corruption perceptions; however, excessive transparency without effective communication may lead to confusion and diminished trust. Political stability contributes to institutional confidence through consistent governance and problem-solving, yet excessive stability may result in stagnation if not balanced with adaptability. Leadership emerged as a pivotal factor, demonstrating that ethical and participatory leadership significantly enhances public perception of governance. The study integrates Institutional Trust Theory and Political Legitimacy Theory, proposing a holistic framework where transparency, stability, and leadership interact dynamically to shape public trust. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to strengthen governance by promoting strategic transparency, adaptive stability, and inclusive leadership. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader academic discourse on governance and trust, offering practical recommendations for building resilient and responsive government institutions that align with societal values and expectations.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Books.
Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & Ralphs, R. (2010). The problem of proliferation: Guidelines for improving the security of qualitative data in a digital age. Research Ethics, 6(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/174701611000600102
Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138862.
Atugeba, I. L., & Acquah-Sam,E.(2024).The nexus between corporate governance, political environments, and firm performance: A comparative study of Ghana and Kenya. Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-04-2024-0215
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Chitac, I. M., Knowles, D., & Dhaliwal, S. (2024). What is not said in organisational methodology: How to measure non-verbal communication. Management Decision, 62(4), 1216–1237.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Diamond, L. (2019). Ill winds: Saving democracy from Russian rage, Chinese ambition, and American complacency. Penguin Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon & Schuster.
Gambardella, F. (2023). Coding qualitative data. Springer Texts in Education, 73–78. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_12
Goleman, D. (2017). Leadership That Gets Results (Harvard Business Review Classics). Harvard Business Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250601-9.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575-586.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2019). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. Harper Business.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429–439.
Miller, A., & Listhaug, O. (1999). Political performance and institutional trust. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 204–216). Oxford University Press.
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance? In Pharr, S. J. & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies? (pp. 52-73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Nye, J. S. (2008). The powers to lead. Oxford University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296777.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international
perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0022.
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Article 26. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202260.
