Analyze the consistency of the Sangha Administration Act B.E. 2505 on the Vinaya

Abstract

         This article has object to study an analysis of the consistency between the Buddhist Sangha governmental enactment of B.E. 2505 and Vinaya. The study indicated that Vinaya is a taboo, a permutation, a conservative tradition and a tradition. The Buddha commanded the monks to regulate the monks as a whole, in order to prevent acts that would cause damage to both the private and the public. For faith and to keep the faith. There are penalties for offenders who are guilty of the offense or abuse. The senator must then leave to be a priest. I have to live in the past. The rest must be, and must show offense to another (Penitents). Only the sacred Pajikas need to be sacrificed, so it can be forgiven. The administration of monks in Thailand in the latter part of the monks violated the Vinaya. The censorship was not effective and the monastic government was enacted. Compared with the ban on disciplinary punishment, the act works better, because it can be arrested and punished immediately. Do not let people make mistakes. But in terms of the practice of Buddhism, legal punishment decreases the status of monks as well.