Design and Evaluation of a Reflective Learning Questionnaire for Enhancing Instruction in a Data Analytics and Machine Learning Course
Keywords:
Reflective Learning Questionnaire, Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Self-Assessment, Instructional DevelopmentAbstract
This prototype research aimed to: (1) design a reflective learning questionnaire for the Data Analytics and Machine Learning (DAML) course that evaluates both topic-level understanding and the ability to use data-analysis tools; (2) assess the preliminary instrument quality in terms of internal consistency, its relationship with academic achievement, and its ability to distinguish learners based on their understanding level; and (3) propose practical guidelines for using the questionnaire to enhance teaching and support personalized learning in technical-education contexts. This research was a quantitative prototype investigation using a post-course questionnaire as the data-collection tool. The sample was selected purposively and 19 out of 23 undergraduate students in Manufacturing System Engineering program enrolling in this course filled in the questionnaire voluntarily. Research tools included (1) the reflective learning questionnaire on clustering, association rules, regression, classification and image processing, (2) course grade, and (3) a comprehension test. Data analysis was done through using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and internal consistency (Cronbach's ). The results were as follows: (1) the questionnaire successfully separated the level of understanding between students among topics (regression was the most understood while image processing was the least); (2) students' self-evaluation correlated positively with their academic achievement, especially in topics involving real-world scenarios; and (3) the questionnaire exhibited acceptable overall reliability with a Cronbach's of 0.82, whereby it can be used as a good diagnostic tool to facilitate personalized learning and digital-based teaching in the Data Analytics and Machine Learning course.
References
Alvarado, F. C., León, M. P. & Colon, A. M. O. (2016). Validation of a Questionnaire on Research-based Learning with Engineering Students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), 219-233. doi:10.3926/jotse.227
Baines, S., Boucas, S. B. & Otermans, P. C. J. (2023). Using a Survey and Discussion Forums on Students’ Satisfaction and Experience to inform the Development of a New Virtual Leaning Environment (VLE): A Data-driven Approach to Technology Use in Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Technology in Education, 6(4), 620-634. doi:10.46328/ijte.540
Boyd, E. M. & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective Learning: Key to Learning from Experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99-117. doi:10.1177/0022167883232011
Christensen, R. & Knezek, G. (2016). Validating the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment Questionnaire for 21st Century Learning (TPSA C-21). Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20-31. doi:10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391
Chu, T. C. & Ashraf, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Curriculum Design: A Data-Driven Approach to Higher Education Innovation. Knowledge, 5(3), 1-16. doi:10.3390/knowledge5030014
Cobern, W. & Adams, B. (2020). Establishing Survey Validity: A Practical Guide. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 404-419. doi:10.21449/ijate.781366
El Souefi, N. (2022). Using Lesson Reflective Questionnaires to Support Teachers' Professional Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(5), 318-333. doi:10.13189/ujer.2022.100502
Ersozlu, Z., Taheri, S. & Koch, I. (2024). A Review of Machine Learning Methods Used for Educational Data. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22125-22145. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12704-0
Grus, J. (2019). Data Science from Scratch: First Principles with Python (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
Hassad, R. & Lacullo, G. (2023). Promoting Reflective Learning in Big Data Analytics: Key Facets and Pedagogical Strategies. IASE 2023 Satellite Conference - Fostering Learning of Statistics and Data Science. Toronto Canada: International Association for Statistical Education Publications. doi:10.52041/iase2023.108
Jacoba, F. & Samosa, R. (2024). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Teachers' Readiness, Competence, and Practices Towards International Large-scale Assessment. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1228-1251.
Liu, Y. (2019). Using Reflections and Questioning to Engage and Challenge Online Graduate Learners in Education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(3). doi:10.1186/s41039-019-0098-z
McKinney, W. (2017). Python for Data Analysis. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
Numsang, T. & Tantrarungroj, T. (2018). Validity and Reliability of the Brief COPE Inventory: Thai Version. Journal of the Psychiatric Association of Thailand, 63(2), 189-198.
Plianbumroong, D. & Utaipan, P. (2020). The Effects of Using Reflective Learning to Enhance Nursing Student Critical Thinking. Research and Development Health System Journal, 13(1), 83-93.
Riangrila, P. (2020). Research Studies on Reflective Thinking. Journal of Education Loei Rajabhat University, 14(2), 1-13.
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G. & Vasileva, T. (2024). AI-driven Adaptive Learning for Sustainable Educational Transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921-1947. doi:10.1002/sd.3221
Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Wahono, B. & Chang. C. Y. (2019). Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument (aka) Towards Attitude, Knowledge and Application of STEM. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 63-76. doi:10.33225/jbse/19.18.63
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education & Learning Development Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.