A paradigmatic framework for research design: guidelines for selecting research methods based on Creswell's principles
Keywords:
research framework, Research design, research paradigmAbstract
This study presents a systematic framework for research design based on Creswell's principles for developing effective research plans. The study framework consists of four primary elements: delineating philosophical knowledge claims, evaluating inquiry strategies, determining research methods, and choosing suitable research approaches. The identification of philosophical claims encompasses four major paradigms: The four major paradigms include post-positivism, which emphasizes testing theories and reducing confounding variables; constructivism, which focuses on understanding meanings constructed by individuals; advocacy/ participatory, which emphasizes transformation and participation; and pragmatism, which focuses on problem-solving and achieving desired outcomes. Inquiry strategies are divided into three categories: quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed methods research, with each approach having specific techniques and methods. The identification of research methods consists of determining research instruments, operational procedures, and data analysis methods. The selection of research approaches should consider four critical criteria: research problems and research questions, researchers' personal experiences, target audiences, and constraints regarding time, resources, and expertise. This study framework is beneficial for researchers when designing quality research that aligns with study objectives.
References
Alavi, M., Archibald, M., McMaster, R., Lopez, V., & Cleary, M. (2020). Philosophical paradigms and inquiry designs: Building research capacity among nurse practitioner students. Nurse Education Today, 84, 104243.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.
Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2019). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414-423.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (5th ed). SAGE Publications.
Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 37-38.
Morgan, D. L. (2017). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2022). Towards a comprehensive meta-framework for full integration in mixed methods research. In R. B. Johnson & A. J. Onwuegbuzie (Eds.), The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 565-606). Routledge.
Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2015). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. SAGE Publications.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 107-131.
Shannon-Baker, P. (2018). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed). SAGE Publications.
Wisdom, J. P., Cavaleri, M. A., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Green, C. A. (2012). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47(2), 721-745.
