Studying behaviors based on the principles of Iddhipāda and their relationship with 21st century core skills of undergraduate students at Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University

Authors

  • Thotsaporn Pornvattanasirikul Faculty of Humanities, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
  • Phrakru Phatradhammabundit Faculty of Humanities, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
  • Wirachai Kamthorn Institutes of Research and Development, Dhonburi Rajabhat University

Keywords:

learning behavior, iddhipāda 4, 21st century core skills, 3R skills, 7C skills

Abstract

This research aimed to 1. examine the level of 21st-century core skills among undergraduate students, 2. compare learning behaviors based on the Four Iddhipāda (Pathways to Success) in relation to 21st-century core skills, and 3. validate a development model of 21st-century core skills for undergraduate students at Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. A mixed-methods research design was employed. For the quantitative phase, data were collected from 337 undergraduate students using a questionnaire. The results indicated that students exhibited a high level of learning behaviors based on the Four Iddhipāda, with “Chanda” (zeal or will-to-do) scoring the highest. The overall level of 21st-century core skills was also high, with 3R skills and 7C skills. Comparative analysis revealed that Thai students had significantly higher 21st-century skills than international students. Similarly, senior-year students demonstrated significantly higher skill levels than junior-year students. Behavioral analysis showed that all components of Iddhipāda were positively correlated with 21st-century skills at a statistically significant level. Specifically, “Vimamsā” (investigation) and “Citta” (mental focus) were found to be significant predictors of both 3R and 7C skills, explaining 69.7% of the variance. In the qualitative phase, an expert panel of five Buddhist scholars participated in a connoisseurship-based seminar to validate the IDDIS21-MCU Model. The findings indicated that the model was clear, appropriate, practical for educational contexts, and potentially scalable to international application.

References

ธนะชัย เกิดพรธรรม และพระครูวิรุฬห์สุตคุณ. (2567). แนวทางการพัฒนาผู้ปฏิบัติงานวิชาการในยุคดิจิทัลตามหลักอิทธิบาท 4 ของโรงเรียนสังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาพระนครศรีอยุธยา เขต 2. ปัญญา, 31(1), 103–113. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/panya-thjo/article/view/270809.

มหาวิทยาลัยมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2566). คู่มือการศึกษาระดับบัณฑิตศึกษา. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัย มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2555). วิถีสร้างการเรียนรู้เพื่อศิษย์ ในศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิสดศรี-สฤษดิ์วงศ์.

สมเด็จพระพุทธโฆษาจารย์ (ป. อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2562). พุทธธรรม ฉบับปรับขยาย พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 53 (ฉบับข้อมูลคอมพิวเตอร์ ครั้งที่ 22). กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยเอเชียอาคเนย์.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Dang, T., Du, W., Niu, M., & Xu, Z. (2024). The effects of personality traits on learning engagement among college students: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1476437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476437.

Eisner, E. W. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice (Reissued ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. Teachers College Press.

Fu, P., Gao, C., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Yang, D. (2024). Proactive personality and its impact on online learning engagement through positive emotions and learning motivation. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 79776. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-79776-3.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

Torrington, J., Bower, M., & Burns, E. C. (2024). Elementary students' self-regulation in computer-based learning environments: How do self-report measures, observations and teacher rating relate to task performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13338.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

UNICEF. (2007). A world fit for us: The children's statement from the UN Special Session on Children – five years on. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). https://www.unicef.org/serbia/media/7321/file/A%20world%20fit%20for%20children.pdf.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-20

How to Cite

Pornvattanasirikul, T., Phrakru Phatradhammabundit, & Kamthorn, W. (2025). Studying behaviors based on the principles of Iddhipāda and their relationship with 21st century core skills of undergraduate students at Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. Journal of Administration Management and Sustainable Development, 3(3), 1130–1144. retrieved from https://so15.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jamsd/article/view/1962

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย