Factors affecting customer satisfaction of dark red line Skytrain system for undergraduate students living in Pathumthani province

Main Article Content

Phanrajit Havarangsi
Chanakiat Samarnbutra

บทคัดย่อ

Purpose – This research study aims to find the key components in personal profiles, purchase decisions, and Skytrain operation that affect customer satisfaction with the dark red line Skytrain system. Methodology – With the quantitative method, the survey technique is used to collect data from 400 respondents who are undergraduate students in Pathumthani province. The data analysis uses both descriptive and inferential statistics: frequency, percentage, mean, standard variation, t-test, F-test, and correlation. Findings - The results show that customer satisfaction is affected by a personal profile that is the year of study. In addition, customer satisfaction is affected by purchasing decisions: the reason to purchase, ticket types, channels to buy a ticket, the amount of money put in Rabbit cards, and influencers. Customer satisfaction is affected by Skytrain operation with the SCOR model: plan, source, make, deliver, and return. Research limitations - This study is sectional research as one period of time for data collection. It cannot reveal the trend of changing in the main factors impacting customer satisfaction. This research study's findings cannot be used for other transportation modes as the data are collected from Skytrain customers. Practical implications - Focusing on main factors, transportation service operators can implement the right strategies to increase customer satisfaction. Originality/ value - This paper focuses on creating scales for customer satisfaction. The main factors affecting customer satisfaction are in the scope of this study.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Bangkok Smartcard System. 2020. About rabbit card (Online). https://rabbit.co.th/

about-rabbit-cards-2, November 1, 2020.

Bavarsad, B., A.H. Azizi and F.J. Alesadi. 2013. “Study of relationship between

supply chain management strategy with logistics performance and

organizational performance.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary

Research in Business 4(9): 1308-1317.

BLT Bangkok. 2019. Hua Lamphong and Bangkae stations are ready to open in 2019

(Online). www.bltbangkok.com/bangkok-update/4738/, October 10, 2020.

Chow, G., T.D. Heaven and L.E. Henrikson. 1994. “Logistics performance: Definition

and measurement.” International Journal of Physical Distribution and

Logistics Management 24(1): 17-28.

Coyle, J.J., R.A. Novak, B. Gibson and E.J. Bardi. 2010. Transportation : A supply

chain perspective. 7th ed. Ohio: South-Western College.

El Hajjar, S. 2017. “Normality test, descriptive analysis, and reliability & construction

validity.” Center of Statistical Analysis: 6.

Forslund, H. 2011. “The size of a logistics performance measurement system.”

Facilities 29(3): 133-148.

Hair, J.F. Jr, Black, C.W., Babin, J.B., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, L.R. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson.

Huapood. 2020. Table of the comparison of one-trip ticket fees (Online).

https://www.huapood.com.

Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. 2016. Marketing management. 15th ed. Essex: Pearson

Education.

Piriyakul, M. and C. Kerdpitak. 2011. “Mediation effects of logistics performance

on collaboration and firm performance of palm oil companies: PLS path

modeling.” Journal of Management and Sustainability 1(1): 90-98.

Maple Tech. International. 2020. Sample size calculator (Online).

https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html, July 16, 2020.

Marr, B. 2012. Key performance indicators (KPI): The 75 measures every

manager needs to knows (Financial Times Series). New Jersey: FT Press.

Meghanathan, N. 2016. “Assortativity analysis of real-world network graphs based on

centrality metrics.” Computer and Information Science, 7.

Realist Solution. 2018. Red-line skytrain update 2018 (Online). http://www.realist.co.th,

October 21, 2020.