Air Pollution Process Management of The Thai Modern Era in Chiang Mai Province

Abstract

The objectives of this research are: 1) to study problems relating to the process management of air pollution in the Thai modern era in Chiang Mai province 2) to study and analyze the process management affecting efficiency and effectiveness of air pollution in the Thai modern era in Chiang Mai province 3) to study the level of process management of air pollution in the Thai modern era in Chiang Mai Province. This research applied quantitative research method. The sample used in this research was 400 people in Chiang Mai province. The research tool was a questionnaire created by studying literatures and relevant researches along with using the tools for collecting data from the sample which covered the contents and objectives of the study. The statistically analyzed variables were used to create a questionnaire for collecting data with the informants to gain insights.

The research found that: The weighted average of the operation process management in all four aspects was 3.05. The S.D. value was 0.89, which was considered moderate. Communication, Knowledge-providing process, and Practice were the top three factors with the highest weighted average, with mean values of 3.10, 3.08, and 3.03. All of which were considered moderate, with S.D. values of 0.99, 0.97, and 0.84, respectively. Support had the lowest weighted average, 3.02, with an S.D. value of 0.74, which was considered moderate.

The weighted average of process management efficiency in all three aspects was 3.06. The S.D. was 0.87, which was considered moderate. Comprehensiveness and Result were the first two factors with the highest weighted average, with mean values of 3.11 and 3.10. All of which were considered high and moderate, with S.D. values of 0.87 and 0.82, respectively. Understanding had the lowest weighted average, 2.98, with an S.D. value of 0.88, which was considered moderate.

The levels of air pollution process management in all 5 aspects had a weighted average of 3.07 with an S.D. value of 0.92, which was considered moderate. Environment had the highest weighted average, which was 3.11 with an S.D. value of 0.94, which was considered high, followed by Participation with an average weight of 3.09, with an S.D. value of 0.94, which was considered moderate, Technology with a weighted average of 3.08 with an S.D. value of 0.94, which was considered moderate. and Social condition with a weighted average of 3.06 with an S.D. value of 0.88, respectively. Government had the lowest weighted average, 3.05 with an S.D. value of 0.90, which was considered moderate.